Does the World Bank still want to destroy Selenge River? Ask the US Government…

Does the World Bank still want to destroy Selenge River? Ask the US Government…

st2st2012-07-05-744

Rivers without Boundaries is thrilled to report that "Power for People" campaign we participate in has important new support from unexpected ally – the US Government!!!

Now we hope that the biggest WB donor will object to ill-concieved Mining Infrastructure Support Project(MINIS) in Mongolia that supports feasibility studies for several dams in Selenge River basin that threaten well-being of local people and ecosystem health of Selenge River and Lake Baikal. Giant Shuren Hydropower dam – an ancient idea of Soviet engineers to block the main stem of the Baikal’s main tributary is of [particular concern to NGOs, scientists and Russian Government. Right now some sort of per-feasibility study is performed by German firm Kleinwasserkraft GmBH.

RwB expects that US Director of the World Bank will officially object to ocontinuation of this project that contradicts new policies of the US Government, see exerpts from Washington Post below:

The United States is demanding stricter oversight of World Bank projects amid concern that the bank has slipped in how closely it guards against violence, forced resettlement and other conflict associated with the hydropower dams that it funds.
In a blow to plans set by World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, the United States approved in mid-January 2014 an appropriations bill that orders the bank’s U.S. board member to vote against any major hydroelectric project — a type of development that has been a source of local land conflicts and controversies through­out the bank’s history. The measure also demands that the organization undertake “independent outside evaluations” of all of its lending.
The demand coincides with a spate of disputes between the World Bank, civil society groups and the United States over past bank-funded projects that have been linked to killings of villagers and forcing people from their land.

The recently approved bill included $1.55 billion for the World Bank’s concessional lending arm — what a spokesman for the bank called “strong support.” But the list of amendments reflects skepticism about some of the central ideas that Kim has laid out since he was nominated to the bank’s top job by President Obama two years ago.
Kim has said he wants to steer the bank toward larger “transformational” infrastructure projects and has specifically mentioned the building of large-scale hydroelectric dams in energy-starved parts of Africa and elsewhere to advance development and tackle climate change.
Carle said that Leahy believes the bank’s renewed interest in large hydro projects “is a mistake and wanted to send that message.”
The U.S. vote alone would not be enough to
block hydroelectric or other projects from moving forward. But the Leahy amendments recommend withholding U.S. funding for the bank unless an outside evaluation process is established.
They also require U.S. Treasury officials and the American member of the World Bank board to pressure the organization to more quickly resolve disputes where “individuals and communities . . . suffer violations of human rights, including forced displacement, resulting from any loan, grant, strategy or policy.”
The amendments apply to all international financial institutions, including regional ones such as the Inter-American Development Bank and the African Development Bank.

By Howard Schneider
The Washington Post, January 24, 2014

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.