Home » Central Asia Basins, Ob Basin, Ob River

“Surplus Russian water” to quench Xinjiang’s thirst?

26 May 2016 Topics:

Altai floodwater could be sent to parched Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China, says Russian agriculture minister.

image

Picture by Sarukhanov. Novaya Gazeta.

‘We are ready to offer the project of the transfer of fresh water from the Altai region of Russia through Kazakhstan to arid Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China,’ said the minister. In the near future we will hold consultations with our colleagues from Kazakhstan on this issue.’ He said the plan could be implemented without any damage to ecology. Tkachev said that Russia can spare from 70 to 1000 million cubic meters a year.

The key to the Tkachev’s  masterplan – unveiled at a meeting with Chinese Minister of Agriculture Han Changfu – is utilizing the Gilevsky reservoir in Altai region, in operation since 1979, and the Kulundinsky ‘channel’ built in the decade to 1983. However real initial  source for both systems is Ob River, which 30 yeas ago was saved from infamous “Perebroska -North-South Water Transfer”.

Opposition blogger Andrei Malgin recalled that Soviet mega-project that was never carried out. ‘Remember the project to divert Siberian rivers to irrigate Central Asia, which was well-publicized in the 1970s but was not implemented in the end? ‘According to the assurances of Party bosses, Central Asia was supposed to have been transformed and have flourished. It seems that this project has come back to life. However, it is China that will flourish.”

There are warnings that the new scheme would deprive the Ob River – the seventh longest in the world – of water when navigation has already faced problems in recent years.

Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, an economist, environmentalist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, warned: ‘To declare the global plans of the transfer of fresh water to China, without detailed calculations, is total folly.

Gennady Baryshnikov, deputy head of the natural resources and geo-ecology department at Altai State University, said it was vital to consult citizens and experts on such a scheme. ‘If we are offered such project, there must be public and scientific hearings,’ he said.

‘This project is impossible to implement without the opinion of the scientific community of the Altai region. Tkachev’s words were a complete surprise for us. ‘So far, I cannot imagine how it can be done. It can affect the interests of different countries – the water should be carried through Kazakhstan to China, but China gets large volumes of water for its cotton fields from the Black Irtysh River, which flows through Kazakhstan , he told to the Siberian Times.

Eugene Simonov of Rivers without Boundaries shared Coalition’s concerns with Novaya Gazeta:image

– First of all this plan is complete geographic nonsense. Just look at the map. The area  in question is separated from Xinjiang by….Irtysh River. So if we do  not think about building a canal across the Irtysh river the only remaining option is 1120 kilometer-long “counter-Irtysh” that pushes water half a kilometer uphill to the nearest valley in China that might need water for irrigation.

– Secondly it is economic nonsense – the Minister of Agriculture should be concerned with development of food products to export to China, and he proposes to give water to competitors instead.

However there is a third dimension and it is dangerous one. China is already diverting several cubic kilometers from Black Irtysh River in Xinjiang and refuses to negotiate the water management issue with downstream Russia and Kazakhstan in trilateral format. Given  current policies of the Silk Road Strategy of China, it may suggest to collaborate on a much shorter canal  from Ob to Irtysh River to employ its hungry hydro engineering companies  and  to help Russia and Kazakhstan to  “compensate” lack of water resources caused by ever growing withdrawals upstream in China.

In absence of clear trilateral river basin management agreement for Irtysh  and clear and sufficient environmental flow norms agreed  between China and downstream countries, such project would be very dangerous –told Simonov to Novaya Gazeta

Tkachev appeared to soft pedal after negative reactions to his plans. ‘There are no plans to implement this project in the near future,’ he said. ‘The issue of supplying fresh water to China can only be considered provided that Russia’s interests are respected unconditionally, not least from the environmental perspective.'(

Sources: Siberian Times , Novaya Gazeta

 

 

 

 

 

Comments are closed.